Sometimes, a for loop is best
It can feel polished to always use a functional style. In Rust, for example,
programmers often use .map(|x| { ... })
to apply a transformation to the data
being processed. This is generally an elegant idiom, but can feel forced.
Creating an inner closure adds syntactic noise to the program via the vertical bars, and new variable name(s).
Taking advantage of .map()
and its uncommonly seen cousin .for_each()
can
lead to somewhat hostile style. It forces programmers that mostly used imperative languages, such as Java and Go, to spend extra time to parse
and interpret your intent.
If you’re applying a complex transformation, consider sticking with a for
loop. You’ll feel less fancy, but your code will be simpler.
1 note
- bigntallmike liked this
- tim-mcnamara posted this